PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-47.60%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with CPAC at -46.29%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
9.21%
D&A growth well above CPAC's 17.26%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-2468.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CPAC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-11.59%
Negative yoy SBC while CPAC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
479.04%
Slight usage while CPAC is negative at -52.12%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
1000.64%
AR growth while CPAC is negative at -289.31%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-237.69%
Negative yoy inventory while CPAC is 123.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.75%
Some yoy usage while CPAC is negative at -69.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
349.64%
Well above CPAC's 83.59%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
83.71%
Some CFO growth while CPAC is negative at -21.09%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-76.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with CPAC at -115.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
96.49%
Acquisition growth of 96.49% while CPAC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-57.14%
Negative yoy purchasing while CPAC stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4376.19%
We reduce yoy other investing while CPAC is 16988.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1.85%
We reduce yoy invests while CPAC stands at 106.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
771.60%
Debt repayment above 1.5x CPAC's 107.57%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
1071.60%
Issuance growth of 1071.60% while CPAC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
18.61%
Buyback growth of 18.61% while CPAC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.