PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-113.82%
Negative net income growth while CPAC stands at 47.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-6.47%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with CPAC at -12.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
120.48%
Deferred tax of 120.48% while CPAC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
4.92%
SBC growth of 4.92% while CPAC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-197.77%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CPAC at -114.27%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-119.07%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with CPAC at -577.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
22.35%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. CPAC's 483.95%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1036.49%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CPAC at -145.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-78.51%
Both negative yoy, with CPAC at -804.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-124.14%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with CPAC at -44.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
27.54%
Some CapEx rise while CPAC is negative at -38.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-1120.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while CPAC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while CPAC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.39%
We have some outflow growth while CPAC is negative at -106.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
48.89%
We have mild expansions while CPAC is negative at -1443.52%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
172.79%
We repay more while CPAC is negative at -1443.14%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-79.42%
Negative yoy issuance while CPAC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-20.16%
We cut yoy buybacks while CPAC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.