PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-87.96%
Negative net income growth while CX stands at 157.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
7.30%
D&A growth well above CX's 3.14%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-100.97%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CX stands at 98.23%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-4.76%
Both cut yoy SBC, with CX at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-464.98%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CX at -178.07%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-434.04%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with CX at -184.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-443.95%
Negative yoy inventory while CX is 57.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-1952.85%
Both negative yoy AP, with CX at -317.91%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-9.89%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CX at -162.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-33.77%
Both negative yoy, with CX at -10.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-135.43%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with CX at -102.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
3.25%
Lower CapEx growth vs. CX's 55.52%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-940.57%
Negative yoy acquisition while CX stands at 107.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-142.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with CX at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with CX at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-828.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with CX at -136.85%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-182.29%
We reduce yoy invests while CX stands at 53.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-37.70%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CX is 23.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
100.00%
We slightly raise equity while CX is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
46.04%
Buyback growth below 50% of CX's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.