PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1035.09%
Some net income increase while CX is negative at -9.44%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.80%
Some D&A expansion while CX is negative at -3.26%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
745.04%
Well above CX's 382.99% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
10.00%
SBC growth of 10.00% while CX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
59.34%
Well above CX's 96.31% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-218.87%
AR is negative yoy while CX is 35.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
135.44%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. CX's 1615.69%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
258.35%
AP growth well above CX's 127.59%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
6.84%
Some yoy usage while CX is negative at -94.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
2251.71%
Some yoy increase while CX is negative at -98.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
309.39%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of CX's 2669.01%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-22.43%
Negative yoy CapEx while CX is 1.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
102.12%
Some acquisitions while CX is negative at -28.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
176.92%
Purchases growth of 176.92% while CX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
145.95%
We have some outflow growth while CX is negative at -359.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
75.22%
We have mild expansions while CX is negative at -67.48%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
57.72%
Debt repayment above 1.5x CX's 17.35%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.75%
Buyback growth of 37.75% while CX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.