111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-47.60%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with CX at -76.97%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
9.21%
Some D&A expansion while CX is negative at -2.56%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-2468.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CX stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-11.59%
Negative yoy SBC while CX is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
479.04%
Slight usage while CX is negative at -0.29%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
1000.64%
AR growth well above CX's 105.83%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-237.69%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with CX at -70.22%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.75%
Some yoy usage while CX is negative at -187.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
349.64%
Well above CX's 213.93%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
83.71%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of CX's 235.44%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-76.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with CX at -80.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
96.49%
Some acquisitions while CX is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-57.14%
Negative yoy purchasing while CX stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4376.19%
We reduce yoy other investing while CX is 2686.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1.85%
We reduce yoy invests while CX stands at 277.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
771.60%
Debt repayment well below CX's 5654.56%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
1071.60%
Issuance growth of 1071.60% while CX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
18.61%
Buyback growth of 18.61% while CX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.