PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-101.75%
Negative net income growth while EXP stands at 20.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-48.94%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with EXP at -135.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.17%
Less SBC growth vs. EXP's 83.49%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-455.12%
Negative yoy working capital usage while EXP is 64.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth while EXP is negative at -116.61%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
66.87%
Inventory growth well above EXP's 109.31%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while EXP is 818.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-76.09%
Negative yoy while EXP is 199.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-121.11%
Negative yoy CFO while EXP is 128.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
64.19%
CapEx growth well above EXP's 26.82%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
93.40%
Some acquisitions while EXP is negative at -134.74%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
93.55%
Purchases growth of 93.55% while EXP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.30%
We reduce yoy other investing while EXP is 65.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
83.83%
We have mild expansions while EXP is negative at -85.10%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
118.93%
We repay more while EXP is negative at -155.10%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-80.00%
Negative yoy issuance while EXP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
54.78%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x EXP's 3.46%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.