PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4000.00%
Net income growth above 1.5x EXP's 24.58%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
32.55%
Some D&A expansion while EXP is negative at -1.40%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.45%
Both cut yoy SBC, with EXP at -29.66%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
108.31%
Well above EXP's 43.91% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
189.86%
Some inventory rise while EXP is negative at -72.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.18%
Some yoy increase while EXP is negative at -11.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
348.73%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x EXP's 22.68%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-32.23%
Negative yoy CapEx while EXP is 18.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
64.52%
Acquisition spending well above EXP's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-2900.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while EXP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
447.06%
Growth well above EXP's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
15.85%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. EXP's 67.65%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-191.55%
We cut debt repayment yoy while EXP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while EXP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-189.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with EXP at -3.95%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.