111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.67%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with EXP at -14.22%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-27.31%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with EXP at -0.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-100.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
8.62%
SBC growth while EXP is negative at -4.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
223.47%
Well above EXP's 234.92% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. EXP's 1259.11%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-59.74%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with EXP at -2919.64%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with EXP at -107.89%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
100.00%
Growth well above EXP's 101.26%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-3.21%
Negative yoy while EXP is 9.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
20.40%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x EXP's 8.91%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-19.13%
Negative yoy CapEx while EXP is 23.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-285.45%
Negative yoy acquisition while EXP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
150.83%
Purchases growth of 150.83% while EXP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.19%
We reduce yoy other investing while EXP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-79.35%
We reduce yoy invests while EXP stands at 23.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
1403.85%
Debt repayment above 1.5x EXP's 8.00%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with EXP at -24.41%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.