111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-87.96%
Negative net income growth while EXP stands at 73.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
7.30%
Some D&A expansion while EXP is negative at -0.35%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-100.97%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-4.76%
Both cut yoy SBC, with EXP at -0.11%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-464.98%
Negative yoy working capital usage while EXP is 26.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-434.04%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with EXP at -654.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-443.95%
Negative yoy inventory while EXP is 105.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-1952.85%
Negative yoy AP while EXP is 47.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-9.89%
Negative yoy usage while EXP is 435.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-33.77%
Negative yoy while EXP is 16.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-135.43%
Negative yoy CFO while EXP is 109.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
3.25%
Some CapEx rise while EXP is negative at -2.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-940.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with EXP at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-142.62%
Negative yoy purchasing while EXP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while EXP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-828.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while EXP is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-182.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with EXP at -2.07%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-37.70%
We cut debt repayment yoy while EXP is 87.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while EXP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
46.04%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x EXP's 15.09%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.