PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1035.09%
Net income growth above 1.5x EXP's 7.23%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
6.80%
D&A growth well above EXP's 1.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
745.04%
Well above EXP's 242.31% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
10.00%
SBC growth well above EXP's 7.16%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
59.34%
Less working capital growth vs. EXP's 251.99%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-218.87%
AR is negative yoy while EXP is 142.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
135.44%
Some inventory rise while EXP is negative at -215.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
258.35%
A yoy AP increase while EXP is negative at -175.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
6.84%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. EXP's 45.95%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
2251.71%
Some yoy increase while EXP is negative at -107.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
309.39%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x EXP's 75.87%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-22.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with EXP at -100.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
102.12%
Acquisition growth of 102.12% while EXP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
176.92%
Purchases growth of 176.92% while EXP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
145.95%
Growth of 145.95% while EXP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
75.22%
We have mild expansions while EXP is negative at -175.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
57.72%
We repay more while EXP is negative at -266.67%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.75%
Repurchase growth 1.25-1.5x EXP's 30.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm invests enough in expansions while boosting EPS.