PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-113.82%
Negative net income growth while EXP stands at 85.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-6.47%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with EXP at -3.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
120.48%
Well above EXP's 143.35% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
4.92%
SBC growth well above EXP's 6.63%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-197.77%
Negative yoy working capital usage while EXP is 21.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-119.07%
AR is negative yoy while EXP is 31.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
22.35%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. EXP's 211.35%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1036.49%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EXP at -404.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-78.51%
Negative yoy while EXP is 13.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-124.14%
Negative yoy CFO while EXP is 117.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
27.54%
Some CapEx rise while EXP is negative at -57.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-1120.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while EXP stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while EXP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.39%
Growth of 123.39% while EXP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
48.89%
Investing outflow well above EXP's 61.62%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
172.79%
We repay more while EXP is negative at -69.84%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-79.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with EXP at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-20.16%
We cut yoy buybacks while EXP is 17.01%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.