PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1035.09%
Some net income increase while JHX is negative at -3.87%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.80%
D&A growth well above JHX's 1.34%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
745.04%
Some yoy growth while JHX is negative at -50.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
10.00%
SBC growth well above JHX's 1.64%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
59.34%
Slight usage while JHX is negative at -162.23%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-218.87%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with JHX at -41.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
135.44%
Some inventory rise while JHX is negative at -61.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
258.35%
AP growth well above JHX's 1.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
6.84%
Some yoy usage while JHX is negative at -161.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
2251.71%
Well above JHX's 133.33%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
309.39%
Some CFO growth while JHX is negative at -18.03%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-22.43%
Negative yoy CapEx while JHX is 17.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
102.12%
Acquisition growth of 102.12% while JHX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
176.92%
Purchases growth of 176.92% while JHX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
145.95%
Growth well above JHX's 178.97%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
75.22%
Investing outflow well above JHX's 33.24%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
57.72%
We repay more while JHX is negative at -31.01%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.75%
We have some buyback growth while JHX is negative at -47.55%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.