PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-113.82%
Negative net income growth while JHX stands at 179.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-6.47%
Negative yoy D&A while JHX is 3.11%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
120.48%
Well above JHX's 219.54% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
4.92%
SBC growth while JHX is negative at -44.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-197.77%
Both reduce yoy usage, with JHX at -59.81%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-119.07%
AR is negative yoy while JHX is 101.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
22.35%
Some inventory rise while JHX is negative at -48.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1036.49%
Both reduce yoy usage, with JHX at -820.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-78.51%
Both negative yoy, with JHX at -88.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-124.14%
Negative yoy CFO while JHX is 12.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
27.54%
Some CapEx rise while JHX is negative at -7.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-1120.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with JHX at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while JHX is negative at -49.92%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.39%
We have some outflow growth while JHX is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
48.89%
We have mild expansions while JHX is negative at -10.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
172.79%
Debt repayment above 1.5x JHX's 0.09%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-79.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with JHX at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-20.16%
We cut yoy buybacks while JHX is 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.