111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-101.75%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MLM at -33.84%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-48.94%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MLM at -6.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.17%
Less SBC growth vs. MLM's 66.67%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-455.12%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MLM at -179.75%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth while MLM is negative at -106.07%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
66.87%
Some inventory rise while MLM is negative at -84.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MLM at -507.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-76.09%
Negative yoy while MLM is 156.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-121.11%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MLM at -62.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
64.19%
Some CapEx rise while MLM is negative at -0.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
93.40%
Acquisition spending well above MLM's 178.75%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
93.55%
Some yoy expansion while MLM is negative at -320.75%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.30%
We reduce yoy other investing while MLM is 247.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
83.83%
Investing outflow well above MLM's 4.39%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
118.93%
We repay more while MLM is negative at -10.26%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-80.00%
Negative yoy issuance while MLM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
54.78%
We have some buyback growth while MLM is negative at -3307.41%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.