PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4000.00%
Net income growth above 1.5x MLM's 186.68%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
32.55%
D&A growth well above MLM's 1.40%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.45%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MLM at -2.14%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
108.31%
Slight usage while MLM is negative at -8.24%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
189.86%
Inventory growth well above MLM's 88.11%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.18%
Some yoy increase while MLM is negative at -165.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
348.73%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MLM's 123.05%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-32.23%
Negative yoy CapEx while MLM is 31.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
64.52%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. MLM's 228.25%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-2900.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MLM at -228.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
447.06%
Growth well above MLM's 296.20%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
15.85%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MLM's 70.54%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-191.55%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MLM is 4.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while MLM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-189.84%
We cut yoy buybacks while MLM is 17.17%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.