PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.67%
Negative net income growth while MLM stands at 19.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-27.31%
Negative yoy D&A while MLM is 31.69%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MLM stands at 53.57%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
8.62%
SBC growth while MLM is negative at -17.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
223.47%
Slight usage while MLM is negative at -8.61%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth well above MLM's 62.63%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-59.74%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MLM at -288.78%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with MLM at -97.75%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
100.00%
Some yoy usage while MLM is negative at -125.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-3.21%
Negative yoy while MLM is 11.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
20.40%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of MLM's 26.82%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-19.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with MLM at -42.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-285.45%
Negative yoy acquisition while MLM stands at 34.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
150.83%
Purchases well above MLM's 97.27%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.19%
We reduce yoy other investing while MLM is 717.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-79.35%
We reduce yoy invests while MLM stands at 1266.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
1403.85%
We repay more while MLM is negative at -17087.80%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.76%
We cut yoy buybacks while MLM is 98.69%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.