PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-87.96%
Negative net income growth while MLM stands at 263.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
7.30%
D&A growth well above MLM's 1.09%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-100.97%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-4.76%
Negative yoy SBC while MLM is 36.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-464.98%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MLM is 98.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-434.04%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MLM at -81.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-443.95%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MLM at -45.55%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-1952.85%
Negative yoy AP while MLM is 124.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-9.89%
Negative yoy usage while MLM is 5064.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-33.77%
Both negative yoy, with MLM at -4925.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-135.43%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MLM at -69.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
3.25%
Some CapEx rise while MLM is negative at -7.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-940.57%
Negative yoy acquisition while MLM stands at 392.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-142.62%
Negative yoy purchasing while MLM stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while MLM is 900.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-828.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MLM is 12477.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-182.29%
We reduce yoy invests while MLM stands at 974.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-37.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with MLM at -11.11%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while MLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
46.04%
We have some buyback growth while MLM is negative at -4445.45%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.