PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1035.09%
Some net income increase while MLM is negative at -71.87%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.80%
D&A growth well above MLM's 9.23%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
745.04%
Well above MLM's 105.26% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
10.00%
Less SBC growth vs. MLM's 20.00%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
59.34%
Slight usage while MLM is negative at -225.14%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-218.87%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MLM at -474.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
135.44%
Inventory growth well above MLM's 125.88%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
258.35%
AP growth well above MLM's 66.67%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
6.84%
Some yoy usage while MLM is negative at -177.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
2251.71%
Well above MLM's 145.83%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
309.39%
Some CFO growth while MLM is negative at -99.42%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-22.43%
Negative yoy CapEx while MLM is 30.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
102.12%
Some acquisitions while MLM is negative at -225.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
176.92%
Purchases growth of 176.92% while MLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
145.95%
We have some outflow growth while MLM is negative at -100.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
75.22%
We have mild expansions while MLM is negative at -253.79%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
57.72%
Debt repayment growth of 57.72% while MLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.75%
We have some buyback growth while MLM is negative at -100.67%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.