PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-47.60%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MLM at -19.01%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
9.21%
Some D&A expansion while MLM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-2468.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MLM stands at 209.09%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-11.59%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MLM at -33.33%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
479.04%
Well above MLM's 156.04% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
1000.64%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. MLM's 11800.00%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-237.69%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MLM at -126.67%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.75%
Some yoy usage while MLM is negative at -34.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
349.64%
Well above MLM's 459.38%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
83.71%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MLM's 14.33%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-76.27%
Negative yoy CapEx while MLM is 17.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
96.49%
Some acquisitions while MLM is negative at -17085.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-57.14%
Negative yoy purchasing while MLM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4376.19%
We reduce yoy other investing while MLM is 290.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with MLM at -363.09%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
771.60%
Debt repayment well below MLM's 34275.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
1071.60%
Issuance growth of 1071.60% while MLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
18.61%
Buyback growth of 18.61% while MLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.