PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-113.82%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MLM at -60.54%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-6.47%
Negative yoy D&A while MLM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
120.48%
Some yoy growth while MLM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
4.92%
Less SBC growth vs. MLM's 210.00%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-197.77%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MLM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-119.07%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MLM at -128.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
22.35%
Some inventory rise while MLM is negative at -1325.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1036.49%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MLM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-78.51%
Both negative yoy, with MLM at -172.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-124.14%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MLM at -68.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
27.54%
CapEx growth of 27.54% while MLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
-1120.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MLM stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while MLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.39%
We have some outflow growth while MLM is negative at -169.05%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
48.89%
Investing outflow well above MLM's 81.01%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
172.79%
We repay more while MLM is negative at -100.37%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-79.42%
Negative yoy issuance while MLM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-20.16%
Both yoy lines negative, with MLM at -1707.14%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.