PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1620.28%
Net income growth above 1.5x MLM's 182.76%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
27.95%
D&A growth well above MLM's 8.44%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.14%
SBC growth while MLM is negative at -80.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
200.00%
Well above MLM's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-363.96%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MLM at -142.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
116.72%
Inventory growth well above MLM's 126.32%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
Some yoy usage while MLM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-190.32%
Both negative yoy, with MLM at -3900.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
318.04%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MLM's 77.52%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-18.06%
Negative yoy CapEx while MLM is 23.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
80.16%
Acquisition growth of 80.16% while MLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-137.77%
We reduce yoy other investing while MLM is 62.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1.45%
We reduce yoy invests while MLM stands at 27.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-200.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MLM at -40.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x MLM's 100.00%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.