111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.67%
Negative net income growth while SUM stands at 174.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-27.31%
Negative yoy D&A while SUM is 1.27%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-100.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
8.62%
SBC growth while SUM is negative at -0.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
223.47%
Slight usage while SUM is negative at -136.40%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth well above SUM's 94.87%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-59.74%
Negative yoy inventory while SUM is 151.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with SUM at -111.66%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
100.00%
Some yoy usage while SUM is negative at -614.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-3.21%
Negative yoy while SUM is 44.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
20.40%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SUM's 59.63%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-19.13%
Negative yoy CapEx while SUM is 12.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-285.45%
Negative yoy acquisition while SUM stands at 98.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
150.83%
Purchases growth of 150.83% while SUM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with SUM at -29.16%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-79.35%
We reduce yoy invests while SUM stands at 77.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
1403.85%
Debt repayment above 1.5x SUM's 21.94%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.76%
We cut yoy buybacks while SUM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.