PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-47.60%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SUM at -0.85%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
9.21%
Some D&A expansion while SUM is negative at -5.02%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-2468.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SUM stands at 27.46%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-11.59%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SUM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
479.04%
Well above SUM's 71.81% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
1000.64%
AR growth well above SUM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-237.69%
Negative yoy inventory while SUM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.75%
Some yoy usage while SUM is negative at -137.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
349.64%
Some yoy increase while SUM is negative at -93.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
83.71%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SUM's 53.56%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-76.27%
Negative yoy CapEx while SUM is 15.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
96.49%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. SUM's 635.05%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-57.14%
Negative yoy purchasing while SUM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4376.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with SUM at -7.11%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1.85%
We reduce yoy invests while SUM stands at 70.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
771.60%
Debt repayment above 1.5x SUM's 58.02%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
1071.60%
Issuance growth of 1071.60% while SUM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
18.61%
Buyback growth of 18.61% while SUM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.