PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-113.82%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SUM at -0.85%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-6.47%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SUM at -5.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
120.48%
Well above SUM's 27.46% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
4.92%
SBC growth while SUM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-197.77%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SUM is 71.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-119.07%
AR is negative yoy while SUM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
22.35%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SUM's 100.00%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1036.49%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SUM at -137.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-78.51%
Both negative yoy, with SUM at -93.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-124.14%
Negative yoy CFO while SUM is 53.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
27.54%
CapEx growth well above SUM's 15.55%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-1120.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SUM stands at 635.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while SUM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.39%
We have some outflow growth while SUM is negative at -7.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
48.89%
Investing outflow well above SUM's 70.54%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
172.79%
Debt repayment above 1.5x SUM's 58.02%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-79.42%
Negative yoy issuance while SUM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-20.16%
We cut yoy buybacks while SUM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.