PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-101.75%
Negative net income growth while USLM stands at 58.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-48.94%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with USLM at -48.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.17%
SBC growth well above USLM's 15.34%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-455.12%
Both reduce yoy usage, with USLM at -195.22%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth while USLM is negative at -179.84%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
66.87%
Some inventory rise while USLM is negative at -28.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while USLM is 206.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-76.09%
Negative yoy while USLM is 98.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-121.11%
Negative yoy CFO while USLM is 0.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
64.19%
CapEx growth well above USLM's 37.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
93.40%
Some acquisitions while USLM is negative at -97.87%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
93.55%
Purchases growth of 93.55% while USLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.30%
We reduce yoy other investing while USLM is 102.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
83.83%
Investing outflow well above USLM's 32.56%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
118.93%
Debt repayment growth of 118.93% while USLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-80.00%
Negative yoy issuance while USLM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
54.78%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of USLM's 85.61%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.