PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4000.00%
Net income growth above 1.5x USLM's 15.25%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
32.55%
D&A growth well above USLM's 3.05%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.45%
Both cut yoy SBC, with USLM at -1.97%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
108.31%
Slight usage while USLM is negative at -129.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
189.86%
Inventory growth well above USLM's 87.68%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.18%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. USLM's 102.94%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
348.73%
Some CFO growth while USLM is negative at -4.92%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-32.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with USLM at -83.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
64.52%
Some acquisitions while USLM is negative at -5.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-2900.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while USLM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
447.06%
We have some outflow growth while USLM is negative at -5.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
15.85%
We have mild expansions while USLM is negative at -85.09%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-191.55%
We cut debt repayment yoy while USLM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while USLM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-189.84%
We cut yoy buybacks while USLM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.