PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.67%
Negative net income growth while USLM stands at 5.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-27.31%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with USLM at -1.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while USLM stands at 145.89%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
8.62%
SBC growth while USLM is negative at -1.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
223.47%
Well above USLM's 51.71% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth while USLM is negative at -39.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-59.74%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with USLM at -369.74%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while USLM is 128.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
100.00%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. USLM's 2058.33%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-3.21%
Negative yoy while USLM is 150.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
20.40%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of USLM's 24.35%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-19.13%
Negative yoy CapEx while USLM is 48.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-285.45%
Negative yoy acquisition while USLM stands at 1607.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
150.83%
Purchases growth of 150.83% while USLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.19%
We reduce yoy other investing while USLM is 1607.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-79.35%
We reduce yoy invests while USLM stands at 67.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
1403.85%
Debt repayment growth of 1403.85% while USLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.76%
We cut yoy buybacks while USLM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.