PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1035.09%
Net income growth above 1.5x USLM's 16.12%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
6.80%
Some D&A expansion while USLM is negative at -1.50%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
745.04%
Well above USLM's 31.51% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
10.00%
SBC growth while USLM is negative at -7.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
59.34%
Slight usage while USLM is negative at -429.31%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-218.87%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with USLM at -0.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
135.44%
Some inventory rise while USLM is negative at -11.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
258.35%
A yoy AP increase while USLM is negative at -291.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
6.84%
Some yoy usage while USLM is negative at -268.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
2251.71%
Well above USLM's 48.12%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
309.39%
Some CFO growth while USLM is negative at -21.98%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-22.43%
Negative yoy CapEx while USLM is 35.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
102.12%
Some acquisitions while USLM is negative at -12.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
176.92%
Purchases growth of 176.92% while USLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
145.95%
We have some outflow growth while USLM is negative at -12.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
75.22%
Investing outflow well above USLM's 36.11%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
57.72%
Debt repayment growth of 57.72% while USLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.75%
Buyback growth below 50% of USLM's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.