PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-47.60%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with USLM at -19.08%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
9.21%
Some D&A expansion while USLM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-2468.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while USLM stands at 58.73%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-11.59%
Negative yoy SBC while USLM is 8.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
479.04%
Well above USLM's 461.24% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
1000.64%
AR growth well above USLM's 234.77%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-237.69%
Negative yoy inventory while USLM is 120.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.75%
Some yoy usage while USLM is negative at -307.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
349.64%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. USLM's 87957.14%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
83.71%
Some CFO growth while USLM is negative at -1.14%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-76.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with USLM at -114.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
96.49%
Acquisition growth of 96.49% while USLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-57.14%
Negative yoy purchasing while USLM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4376.19%
We reduce yoy other investing while USLM is 307.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with USLM at -112.41%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
771.60%
Debt repayment growth of 771.60% while USLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1071.60%
Stock issuance far above USLM's 100.00%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
18.61%
We have some buyback growth while USLM is negative at -2040.12%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.