PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-113.82%
Negative net income growth while USLM stands at 26.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-6.47%
Negative yoy D&A while USLM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
120.48%
Some yoy growth while USLM is negative at -226.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
4.92%
Less SBC growth vs. USLM's 79.28%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-197.77%
Both reduce yoy usage, with USLM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-119.07%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with USLM at -232.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
22.35%
Some inventory rise while USLM is negative at -279.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1036.49%
Negative yoy usage while USLM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-78.51%
Both negative yoy, with USLM at -141.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-124.14%
Negative yoy CFO while USLM is 2.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
27.54%
Some CapEx rise while USLM is negative at -34.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-1120.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while USLM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while USLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.39%
We have some outflow growth while USLM is negative at -98.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
48.89%
We have mild expansions while USLM is negative at -37.09%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
172.79%
Debt repayment growth of 172.79% while USLM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-79.42%
Negative yoy issuance while USLM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-20.16%
We cut yoy buybacks while USLM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.