PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-101.75%
Negative net income growth while VMC stands at 0.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-48.94%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with VMC at -8.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.17%
SBC growth while VMC is negative at -37.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-455.12%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VMC at -217.45%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth well above VMC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
66.87%
Inventory growth well above VMC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VMC at -157.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-76.09%
Both negative yoy, with VMC at -64.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-121.11%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VMC at -44.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
64.19%
Some CapEx rise while VMC is negative at -19.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
93.40%
Acquisition spending well above VMC's 167.42%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
93.55%
Purchases growth of 93.55% while VMC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.30%
We reduce yoy other investing while VMC is 27.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
83.83%
Investing outflow well above VMC's 45.06%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
118.93%
We repay more while VMC is negative at -134.56%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-80.00%
Negative yoy issuance while VMC is 1200.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
54.78%
We have some buyback growth while VMC is negative at -1200.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.