PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4000.00%
Net income growth above 1.5x VMC's 155.25%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
32.55%
Some D&A expansion while VMC is negative at -19.41%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.45%
Negative yoy SBC while VMC is 96.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
108.31%
Slight usage while VMC is negative at -265.40%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
189.86%
Inventory growth of 189.86% while VMC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.18%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. VMC's 184.55%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
348.73%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VMC's 29.33%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-32.23%
Negative yoy CapEx while VMC is 16.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
64.52%
Some acquisitions while VMC is negative at -99.69%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-2900.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while VMC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
447.06%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. VMC's 1264.29%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
15.85%
We have mild expansions while VMC is negative at -129.34%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-191.55%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VMC is 92.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with VMC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-189.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with VMC at -248.95%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.