PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.67%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VMC at -10.14%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-27.31%
Negative yoy D&A while VMC is 5.02%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-100.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
8.62%
Less SBC growth vs. VMC's 19.25%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
223.47%
Well above VMC's 125.24% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while VMC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-59.74%
Negative yoy inventory while VMC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while VMC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
100.00%
Growth well above VMC's 125.24%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-3.21%
Negative yoy while VMC is 117.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
20.40%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of VMC's 91.37%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-19.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with VMC at -93.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-285.45%
Negative yoy acquisition while VMC stands at 1325.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
150.83%
Purchases growth of 150.83% while VMC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with VMC at -70.16%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-79.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with VMC at -116.25%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
1403.85%
We repay more while VMC is negative at -83.33%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.76%
We cut yoy buybacks while VMC is 95.79%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.