PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-87.96%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VMC at -54.55%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
7.30%
Some D&A expansion while VMC is negative at -1.05%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-100.97%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VMC stands at 94.37%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-4.76%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VMC at -53.81%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-464.98%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VMC at -160.98%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-434.04%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VMC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-443.95%
Negative yoy inventory while VMC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-1952.85%
Both negative yoy AP, with VMC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-9.89%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VMC at -160.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-33.77%
Negative yoy while VMC is 733.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-135.43%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VMC at -63.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
3.25%
Lower CapEx growth vs. VMC's 25.93%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-940.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with VMC at -101.97%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-142.62%
Negative yoy purchasing while VMC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while VMC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-828.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with VMC at -100.02%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-182.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with VMC at -147.38%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-37.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with VMC at -1908.76%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while VMC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
46.04%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of VMC's 87.48%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.