PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1035.09%
Net income growth above 1.5x VMC's 196.93%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
6.80%
D&A growth well above VMC's 3.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
745.04%
Some yoy growth while VMC is negative at -680.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
10.00%
Less SBC growth vs. VMC's 69.23%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
59.34%
Slight usage while VMC is negative at -175.82%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-218.87%
AR is negative yoy while VMC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
135.44%
Inventory growth of 135.44% while VMC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
258.35%
AP growth of 258.35% while VMC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
6.84%
Some yoy usage while VMC is negative at -175.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
2251.71%
Well above VMC's 4.56%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
309.39%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VMC's 15.97%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-22.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with VMC at -25.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
102.12%
Some acquisitions while VMC is negative at -1539.45%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
176.92%
Purchases growth of 176.92% while VMC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
145.95%
Growth well above VMC's 200.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
75.22%
We have mild expansions while VMC is negative at -125.89%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
57.72%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of VMC's 82.74%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.75%
We have some buyback growth while VMC is negative at -165.96%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.