PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-47.60%
Negative net income growth while VMC stands at 43.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
9.21%
D&A growth well above VMC's 1.93%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-2468.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VMC stands at 63.78%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-11.59%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VMC at -12.34%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
479.04%
Slight usage while VMC is negative at -124.39%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
1000.64%
AR growth of 1000.64% while VMC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-237.69%
Negative yoy inventory while VMC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.75%
Some yoy usage while VMC is negative at -124.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
349.64%
Well above VMC's 44.84%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
83.71%
Some CFO growth while VMC is negative at -26.03%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-76.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with VMC at -67.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
96.49%
Some acquisitions while VMC is negative at -15744.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-57.14%
Negative yoy purchasing while VMC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4376.19%
We reduce yoy other investing while VMC is 2633.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with VMC at -1912.13%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
771.60%
Debt repayment well below VMC's 2137.65%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
1071.60%
Issuance growth of 1071.60% while VMC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
18.61%
Buyback growth of 18.61% while VMC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.