PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-113.82%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VMC at -55.91%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-6.47%
Negative yoy D&A while VMC is 13.80%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
120.48%
Some yoy growth while VMC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
4.92%
SBC growth well above VMC's 2.96%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-197.77%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VMC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-119.07%
AR is negative yoy while VMC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
22.35%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. VMC's 100.00%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1036.49%
Negative yoy usage while VMC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-78.51%
Both negative yoy, with VMC at -154.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-124.14%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VMC at -42.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
27.54%
Some CapEx rise while VMC is negative at -3.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-1120.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while VMC stands at 100.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while VMC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.39%
We have some outflow growth while VMC is negative at -25.20%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
48.89%
Investing outflow well above VMC's 94.18%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
172.79%
We repay more while VMC is negative at -100.15%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-79.42%
Negative yoy issuance while VMC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-20.16%
We cut yoy buybacks while VMC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.