PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.18%
Negative revenue growth while CX stands at 2.67%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-92.55%
Negative gross profit growth while CX is at 5.68%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-93.04%
Negative EBIT growth while CX is at 4.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-93.04%
Negative operating income growth while CX is at 4.75%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-0.18%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.98%
Share count expansion well above CX's 1.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-4.39%
Reduced diluted shares while CX is at 1.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
158.63%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
104.58%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
56.67%
Positive 3Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.86%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
56.61%
Positive short-term CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.