PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-74.48%
Negative revenue growth while CX stands at 2.06%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-74.48%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
148.53%
Positive EBIT growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
148.53%
Positive operating income growth while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-87.47%
Negative net income growth while CX stands at 8.90%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
118.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x CX's 48.43%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
80.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x CX's 48.43%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
14.58%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of CX's 48.43%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.88%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
9.00%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-42.91%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.