PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
69.54%
Positive revenue growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
483.23%
Positive gross profit growth while CX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2778.72%
Positive EBIT growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2778.72%
Positive operating income growth while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
307.97%
Positive net income growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
283.33%
Positive EPS growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
275.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
22.77%
Share count expansion well above CX's 3.48%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
23.91%
Diluted share count expanding well above CX's 3.48%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
243.99%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
100.73%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
64.96%
Positive 3Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
469.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
106.91%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
97.91%
Positive short-term CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We cut SG&A while CX invests at 6.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.