PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.72%
Positive revenue growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
380.04%
Positive gross profit growth while CX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2200.72%
Positive EBIT growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2200.72%
Positive operating income growth while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
272.22%
Positive net income growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
276.92%
Positive EPS growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
276.92%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.23%
Share reduction more than 1.5x CX's 2.84%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.12%
Reduced diluted shares while CX is at 2.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
292.55%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
88.75%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
121.56%
Positive 3Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
516.49%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
89.69%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-23.58%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We cut SG&A while CX invests at 4.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.