PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
32.26%
Revenue growth above 1.5x CX's 0.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
339.49%
Positive gross profit growth while CX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1632.99%
Positive EBIT growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1632.99%
Positive operating income growth while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
103.24%
Net income growth above 1.5x CX's 44.50%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
104.26%
EPS growth above 1.5x CX's 42.11%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
104.26%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x CX's 42.11%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
305.04%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
101.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x CX's 84.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
25.10%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of CX's 134.59%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
335.47%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
110.46%
Below 50% of CX's 446.17%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
64.98%
Below 50% of CX's 451.78%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We cut SG&A while CX invests at 3.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.