PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.49%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
682.43%
Positive gross profit growth while CX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
140.62%
Positive EBIT growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
140.62%
Positive operating income growth while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-48.59%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-99.71%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-99.71%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
354.43%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x CX's 212.74%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
215.80%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x CX's 174.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
106.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x CX's 88.95%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
255.61%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x CX's 1.89% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
487.10%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x CX's 368.47%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
105.84%
Positive short-term CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We expand SG&A while CX cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.