PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.41%
Positive revenue growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.41%
Positive gross profit growth while EXP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
7.41%
Positive EBIT growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
7.41%
Positive operating income growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
7.40%
Positive net income growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
4.55%
Positive EPS growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
4.55%
Positive diluted EPS growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
2.73%
Slight or no buybacks while EXP is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.73%
Slight or no buyback while EXP is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
177.01%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x EXP's 125.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
135.83%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to EXP's 125.39%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
78.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to EXP's 73.59%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
228.57%
Below 50% of EXP's 809.09%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
64.29%
Below 50% of EXP's 132.56%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.