PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.35%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
594.85%
Positive gross profit growth while EXP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1007.19%
Positive EBIT growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1007.19%
Positive operating income growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
214.64%
Positive net income growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
85.71%
Positive EPS growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
76.19%
Positive diluted EPS growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
2.37%
Slight or no buybacks while EXP is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.37%
Slight or no buyback while EXP is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of EXP's 209.36%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
44.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of EXP's 185.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-11.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while EXP stands at 112.05%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
396.48%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of EXP's 512.77%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
193.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to EXP's 200.38%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.