111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.58%
Negative revenue growth while EXP stands at 15.36%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-34.45%
Negative gross profit growth while EXP is at 12.52%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
144.25%
EBIT growth above 1.5x EXP's 15.96%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
144.25%
Operating income growth above 1.5x EXP's 15.96%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-41.75%
Negative net income growth while EXP stands at 5.86%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-99.72%
Negative EPS growth while EXP is at 6.58%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-99.72%
Negative diluted EPS growth while EXP is at 5.26%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
330.40%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x EXP's 294.45%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
206.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 98.66%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
86.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x EXP's 71.59%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
519.70%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 256.44% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
431.48%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 167.42%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
164.38%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 94.35%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We expand SG&A while EXP cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.