111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.57%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while EXP stands at 96.32%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
28.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXP's 56.73%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
21.92%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to EXP's 22.37%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.80%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXP's 59.78%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
-10.75%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while EXP stands at 12.80%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-40.42%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while EXP is at 327.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
671.79%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 88.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
685.96%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 156.93%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-24.85%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while EXP stands at 217.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
31.40%
Below 50% of EXP's 94.55%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
18.22%
Below 50% of EXP's 41.33%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.31%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 0.36%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
45.93%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 0.41%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.