PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-63.74%
Negative revenue growth while EXP stands at 27.95%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-73.24%
Negative gross profit growth while EXP is at 29.99%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-99.92%
Negative EBIT growth while EXP is at 66.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-99.92%
Negative operating income growth while EXP is at 66.94%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-101.60%
Negative net income growth while EXP stands at 20.42%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-102.14%
Negative EPS growth while EXP is at 22.06%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-102.16%
Negative diluted EPS growth while EXP is at 21.86%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.98%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.87%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while EXP stands at 0.38%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-121.11%
Negative OCF growth while EXP is at 128.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-144.54%
Negative FCF growth while EXP is at 741.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while EXP shows 18.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
1.96%
Inventory growth well above EXP's 3.65%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.76%
Asset growth well under 50% of EXP's 4.86%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-3.50%
We have a declining book value while EXP shows 5.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
1.28%
Debt shrinking faster vs. EXP's 8.36%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.75%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.