PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.07%
Revenue growth above 1.5x EXP's 3.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
126.19%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x EXP's 18.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
81150.00%
Positive EBIT growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
81150.00%
Positive operating income growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
4382.14%
Net income growth above 1.5x EXP's 24.58%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
3260.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x EXP's 25.07%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
3240.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x EXP's 25.29%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.55%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
0.07%
Slight or no buyback while EXP is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
348.73%
OCF growth above 1.5x EXP's 22.68%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
222.63%
FCF growth above 1.5x EXP's 36.76%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
19.40%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of EXP's 244.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-7.17%
Negative 5Y CAGR while EXP stands at 119.69%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
67.54%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to EXP's 64.34%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
454.70%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 298.98%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
709.47%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 149.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
74.50%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2171.35%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 427.49% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
262.25%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x EXP's 179.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
527.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 85.36%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
100.66%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXP's 139.01%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
52.71%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 22.85%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
19.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXP's 32.27%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
165.77%
Similar 10Y dividend/share CAGR to EXP's 151.43%. Walter Schloss expects both to share consistent earnings expansions and payout practices.
143.14%
Similar 5Y dividend/share CAGR to EXP's 150.53%. Walter Schloss sees parallel philosophies in mid-term capital returns.
50.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 50.42% while EXP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.55%
Under 50% of EXP's 6.16%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.90%
SG&A growth well above EXP's 41.93%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.