PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.64%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-22.15%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-41.01%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-43.79%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-45.82%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-48.24%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-48.22%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.47%
Share reduction while EXP is at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.26%
Reduced diluted shares while EXP is at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.05%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while EXP cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
79.61%
Positive OCF growth while EXP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
82.16%
Positive FCF growth while EXP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-8.62%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while EXP stands at 212.65%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-22.98%
Negative 5Y CAGR while EXP stands at 84.62%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-36.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while EXP stands at 32.53%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
113.92%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x EXP's 83.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
2.59%
Positive OCF/share growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
18.08%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
48.90%
Below 50% of EXP's 111.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-9.58%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while EXP is 13.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-51.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while EXP is 4.17%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
131.60%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x EXP's 114.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
50.72%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXP's 86.43%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
22.17%
Below 50% of EXP's 49.64%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
140.45%
Similar 10Y dividend/share CAGR to EXP's 147.09%. Walter Schloss expects both to share consistent earnings expansions and payout practices.
81.94%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXP's 157.83%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
53.18%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while EXP cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-24.95%
Firm’s AR is declining while EXP shows 20.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.39%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. EXP's 5.84%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.19%
Negative asset growth while EXP invests at 7.26%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-0.90%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-1.28%
We’re deleveraging while EXP stands at 22.48%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.49%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.